Abstract
Fertility Awareness Methods (FAM) are based on the observation of physiologically occurring symptoms, so-called fertility indicators, which include: cervical mucus, basal body temperature (BBT) and changes in cervical morphology/consistency. Observations of clinical symptoms in a female patient, which change depending on periodic hormonal fluctuations, were used to determine the first and second phases of the menstrual cycle and the period around ovulation. For many years, FAMs have been successfully used by women who want to plan their motherhood in accordance with their beliefs and chosen lifestyle, in an ecological manner, without pharmacological intervention or unnecessary medical treatments.FAMs have developed over the centuries and are now a well-documented field of reproductive medicine. Initially, FAMs were used only as a tool for planning or postponing the conception of a child, now they are more and more often perceived as an effective and easy-to-use tool in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of the therapy of cycle disorders and infertility. The aim of the study is to present the history of FAM development, to present groundbreaking discoveries and people to whom we owe the current state of knowledge about the symptoms of human fertility. A review of the medical literature was made, also referring to historical works, which included information on breakthrough discoveries in the field of human fertility. The selection of literature was made on the basis of a review of original papers and review publications in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases with the use of the following keywords: „Fertility Awareness Methods”, „Family Planning” and the „Pearl index”.
References
Bączek, G., Manista, B. and Tataj-Puzyna, U. (2017). Knowledge and opinions of medical staff on Natural Fertility Awareness Methods. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 4(32), 215–232.
Berglund Scherwitzl, E., Gemzell Danielsson, K., Sellberg, J.A., & Scherwitzl, R. (2016). Fertility awareness-based mobile application for contraception. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 21(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2016.1154143.
Billings, E. and Westmore, A. (1986). Metoda Billingsa. Sterowanie płodnością bez pomocy środków farmakologicznych i mechanicznych. Edited by B. Olszewska. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.
Czerniak, J. (2017). Naprotechnologia – dobra diagnostyka i skuteczne leczenie. Teologia i Moralność, 12, https://doi.org/10.14746/tim.2017.22.2.9
Danis, P.G., Kurz, S.A. and Covert, L.M. (2017). Medical Students’ Knowledge of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods of Family Planning. Frontiers in Medicine, 4(June), 1–6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00065
Dereń, N., Woźniak, J. and Simińska, E. (2016). Naprotechnologia jako metoda oceny płodności. Biomedyczny Przegląd Naukowy, 1, 42–61.
Dynarski, K. and Przybył, M. (eds) (2007). Księga Rodzaju. Pismo Święte Starego i Nowego Testamentu. V, 24–25, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Pallottinum.
Department of Health (2022). Fertility awareness (natural family planning), (from:) https://www.healthywa.wa.gov.au/Articles/F_I/Fertility-awareness-natural-family-planning, (access: 22.06.2022).
Fijałkowski, W. (2004). Rozwój wiedzy o płodności i metodach jej rozpoznawania. (W:) Z. Szymański (red.), Płodność i planowanie rodziny, 9–15, Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Pomorskiej Akademii Medycznej PAM.
Hassoun, D. (2018). Méthodes de contraception naturelle et méthodes barrières. RPC contraception CNGOF. Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite et Senologie, 46(12), 873–882.
Howards, S.S. (1997). Antoine van Leeuwenhoek and the discovery of sperm. Fertility and Sterility, 67(1), 16–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81848-1
Hübner, S.M. (2009). History of the Egg in Embryology. Biologie in Unserer Zeit, 26(1), 2-9, https://doi.org/10.1002/ biuz.201410549
Insler, V., Melmed, H., Eichenbrenner, I. et al. (1972). The Cervical Score: A Simple Semiquantitative Method for Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 10(6), 223–228, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1879-3479.1972.tb00857.x
Judáková, Z. (2020). The Role of Information Technologies in Natural Family Planning. Family Planning and Reproductive Health, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92136
Kicińska, A.M., Stachowska, A. and Wierzba, T. (2020). Biowskaźniki płodności, obserwacja wg metody InVivo. Gdańsk: Via Medica.
Kinle, M. (2013). Naturalne planowanie rodziny na świecie i w Polsce. Rozpoznawanie płodności. IV. Warszawa, 281–286.
Kinle, M. and Małecka-Holerek, M. (2013). Naturalne planowanie rodziny w aspekcie historycznym. Rozpoznawanie płodności. IV. Warszawa, 271–280.
Kippley, J.F. (2016). A Short History of Natural Family Planning Compiled for those interested in Natural Family Planning and its history. (February), 1–27.
Liji, T. (2019). Natural Family Planning: Advantages and Disadvantages, (from:) https://www.news-medical.net/health/Natural-Family-Planning-Advantages-and-Disadvantages.aspx, (access: 22.06.2022).
Manhart, M.D., Duane, M., Lind, A. et al. (2013). Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning: A review of effectiveness for avoiding pregnancy using SORT. Osteopathic Family Physician, 5(1), 2–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osfp.2012.09.002
NHS (2021). Natural family planning (fertility awareness), (from:) https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception/natural-family-planning/ (access: 22.06.2022).
Obara, M., Szymankiewicz-Warenik, A. and Słomko, Z. (1997). Metody i środki planowania rodziny. Ginekologia. Warszawa.
Odeblad, E. (1994). The Discovery of Different Types of Cervical Mucus and the Billings Ovulation Method. Bulletin of the Ovulation Method Research and Reference Centre of Australia, 21(3), 3–35.
Pallone, S.R. and Bergus, G.R. (2009). Fertility Awareness-Based Methods: Another Option for Family Planning. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 22(2), 147–157, https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080038
Polis, C.B. and Jones, R.K. (2018). Multiple contraceptive method use and prevalence of fertility awareness based method use in the United States, 2013–2015. Contraception, 98(3), 188–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.013
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2015). Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 103(6), e44–e50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.019
PTMRiE and PTGP (2018). Diagnostyka i leczenie niepłodności — rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Medycyny Rozrodu i Embriologii (PTMRiE) oraz Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologów i Położników (PTGP). Via Medica, (3), 112–140.
Targan, M. et al. (2018). Wiedza studentów trójmiejskich uczelni wyższych na temat fizjologii prokreacji oraz metod rozpoznawania płodności. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 3(35), 55–69.
Unseld, M. et al. (2017). Use of Natural family planning (NFP) and its effect on couple relationships and sexual satisfaction: A multi-country survey of NFP users from US and Europe. Frontiers in Public Health, 5(MAR), https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2017.00042
WHO (1967). Biology or fertility control be periodic abstinence. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO (2016). Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO (2018). Family Planning. A global handbook for providers. Geneva: World Health Organization.