Keywords
diagnostic-correlative studies
information literacy
the use of ICT methods and tools
correlation between opinions
How to Cite
Abstract
The article presents a fragment of diagnostic-correlative research of a mixed character, identifying pupils’ information literacy in the use of ICT methods and tools in the context of new technological trends and accompanying civilisation changes. The authors aim to answer the question: What is the relationship between pupils’ opinions and teachers’ observations regarding the spheres and effects of ICT use by children and teenagers? For this purpose, the method of diagnostic survey (questionnaire and interview) and statistical methods were used. Together, 2510 pupils and 1110 teachers (in Poland) were involved. The interpretation of the strength of relationship between the co-existent variables – based on the obtained values of correlation (r) and determination (r2) coefficients – in general allows for stating that: 1) a noticeable dissonance exists between pupils’ opinions and teachers’ observations regarding the spheres and effects of ICT use by children and teenagers; 2) the identified differences (the minus/negative correlations in 6 cases) and similarities (the plus/ positive correlations in 4 cases) between pupils’ and teachers’ opinions indicate a significant “separation” between the world of children and teenagers (“Us”) and the world of teachers (“Them”); 3) in three categories, an obvious relationship (a very high level of dependence) exists between pupils’ and teachers’ observations as to the spheres and effects of ICT use by children and teenagers, namely “working with information” (r2 = 0.79; r = 0.89), “network communication” (r2 = 0.78; r = 0.88), and “preparing for classes” (r2 = 0.70; r = -0.84).
References
Apelojg, B. (2016). Process-Oriented Didactics, Ideas for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, For the Cowboy on the Right Path, from: bit.ly/2NZ69i6, Process- orientedDidactics_online.pdf, (access: 13.07.2021).
Babbie, E. (2016). Practice of Social Research, 14th. Ed., Boston: Cengage Learning.
Bailenson, J. (2020). Why Zoom Meetings Can Exhaust Us. Retrieved 13 July 2021 from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-zoom-meetings-can-exhaust-us-11585953336.
Baron-Polańczyk, E. (2018). My i Oni. Uczniowie wobec nowych trendów ICT [Us and Them. Pupils towards New ICT Trends], Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
Baron-Polańczyk, E. (2019). Reasons for Using ICT by Children and Adolescents in their Daily Practice (Research Report), Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
Baron-Polańczyk, E. (2019). Sources of Pupils’ ICT Knowledge and Skills – Differentiating Factors, The New Educational Review, 2 (56), 29-40, https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2019.56.2.02.
Bauman, Z. (2011), Kultura w płynnej nowoczesności [The Culture of Liquid Modernity], Warszawa: Agora.
Bauman, Z. (2015). Intimations of Postmodernity, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203414934.
Berdik, Ch. (2020). Future of Childhood: Revisiting the Potential Uses of Media in Children’s Education, The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop – The Report that Started It All, from: https://joanganzcooneycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/jgcc_revisitingpotential.pdf, (access: 13.07.2021).
Birch, A. (1997). Developmental Psychology: From Infancy to Adulthood, 2nd edition, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Day, Ch. (1999). Developing Teachers. The Challenges of Lifelong Learning, Bristol PA: Taylor & Francis.
Doucet, A., Netolicky, D., Timmers, K., Tuscano, F.J. (2020). Thinking about Pedagogy in an Unfolding Pandemic: An Independent Report on Approaches to Distance Learning During COVID19 School Closures, from: https://issuu.com/educationinternational/docs/2020_research_covid-19_eng, (access: 13.07.2021).
Dróżka, W. (2010). Triangulacja badań. Badania empiryczne ilościowo-jakościowe [Triangulation in Research. Mixed Empirical Research], (in:) S. Palka (ed.), Podstawy metodologii badań w pedagogice, [Essentials of Research Methodology in Pedagogy], 124-135), Gdańsk: GWP.
D’Souza, K. (2020). Distance Learning Stokes Fears of Excessive Screen Time. Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) – A long-term study of children’s brain development and health in the United States, National Institutes of Health, from: https://edsource.org/2020/distance-learning-stokes-fears-of-excessive-screen-time/644165, (access: 13.07.2021).
Eyman, D. (2015). Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Pactice, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, https://doi.org/10.3998/dh.13030181.0001.001.
Feng, L., Ha, J.-L. (2016). Effects of Teachers’ Information Literacy on Lifelong Learning and School Effectiveness, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &Technology Education, 12(6), 1653-1663, https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1575a.
Ferguson, G.A., Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education, 6th Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ferguson, G.A., Takane, Y. (2016). Analiza statystyczna w psychologii i pedagogice, [Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education], Trans. M. Zagrodzki, Warszawa: PWN.
Frankfort-Nachmias, Ch., Nachmias, D., DeWaard, J. (2015). Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 8th ed., New York: Worth Publishers, a Macmillan Education Company.
Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K-12 Edition, Austin. Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Furmanek, W. (2016). Metodologiczne trudności badań z pogranicza edukacji, techniki i informatyki [Methodological Difficulties Studies Border Issues of Education, Technology and Computer Science, Edukacja – Technika – Informatyka, 4 (18), 21-28, https://doi.org/10.15584/eti.2016.4.1.
Gabriel, R., Röhrs, H.-P. (2017). Social Media. Potenziale, Trends, Chancen und Risiken, Berlin: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53991-0.
Gofron, B. (2013). Konstruktywistyczne ujęcie procesu uczenia się [Constructivist Approach to the Learning Process], Periodyk Naukowy Akademii Polonijnej, 1 (7), 159-173, https://doi.org/10.23856/32.
Góralski, A. (1987). Metody opisu i wnioskowania statystycznego w psychologii i pedagogice, [Methods of Statistical Description and Inference in Psychology and Pedagogy], Warszawa: PWN.
Guerrero, M.D., Barnes, J.D., Chaput, J.-P., Tremblay M.S. (2019). Screen Time and Problem Behaviors in Children: Exploring the Mediating Role of Sleep Duration, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 105, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0862-x.
Guilford, J.P. (1964). Podstawowe metody statystyczne w psychologii i pedagogice, [Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education], Trans. J. Wojtyniak, Warszawa: PWN.
Henson, K.T. (2015). Curriculum Planning. Integrating Multiculturalism, Constructivism, and Education Reform, USA: Waveland Press.
Juszczyk, S. (2006). Statystyka dla pedagogów. Zarys wykładu, [Statistics for Educationalists: the Outline of Lecture], Toruń: A. Marszałek.
King, B.M., Minium, E.W. (2003). Statistical Reasoning in Psychology and Education, Fourth Edition. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
King, B.M., Minium, E.W. (2020). Statystyka dla psychologów i pedagogów, [Statistical Reasoning in Psychology and Education], Trans. M. Zakrzewska, Warszawa: PWN.
Konarzewski, K. (2002). Jak uprawiać badania oświatowe. Metodologia praktyczna, [How to Do Research in Education: Practical Methodology], Warszawa: WSiP.
Kron, F.W., Sofos A. (2003). Mediendidaktik: Neue Medien in Lehr- und Lernprozessen, [Educational Media: New Media in Teaching and Learning], München/Basel: Reinhardt.
Lawrence-Wilkes, L., Ashmore, L. (2014). The Reflective Practitioner in Professional Education, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399595.
Levinson, P. (2013). New New Media, 2th Ed., Boston: Pearson.
Lewicki, C. (1998). Zbiór zadań ze statystyki dla pedagogów, [A Set of Statistical Tasks for Pedagogues], Rzeszów: “Fosze”.
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Staksrud, E. (2018). European Research on Children’s Internet Use. Assessing the Past and Anticipating the Future, New Media and Society, 20 (3), 1103-1122, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930.
Melosik, Z., Szkudlarek T. (2010). Kultura, tożsamość i edukacja. Migotanie znaczeń, [Culture, Identity and Education. Flicker of Meanings], Kraków: “Impuls”.
Mikrut, A. (2001), Wybrane metody statystyki opisowej dla pedagogów, [Selected Methods of Descriptive Statistics for Pedagogues], Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pedagogicznej.
Murphy, K. (2020). Why Zoom is Terrible, The New York Times, 2020-05-04, from: https://nyti.ms/35hnfN7, (access: 13.07.2021).
Nowaczyk, C. (1995). Podstawy metod statystycznych dla pedagogów, [Essentials of Statistical Methods for Pedagogues], Jelenia Góra: “AVIS”.
Pilch, T., Bauman, T. (2010). Zasady badań pedagogicznych. Strategie ilościowe i jakościowe, [Rules of Pedagogical Research. Quantitative and Qualitative Strategies], Warszawa: “Żak”.
Ptaszek, G., Stunża, G.D., Pyżalski, J., Dębski, M., Bigaj, M. (2020). Edukacja zdalna – co się stało z uczniami, ich rodzicami i nauczycielami? [E-learning: What Happened with Pupils, their Parents, and Teachers?], Gdańsk: GWP.
Rasfeld, M., Breidenbach, S. (2014). Schulen im Aufbruch. Eine Anstiftung, [The Call for the Wakening of School], München: Kösel-Verlag.
Rubacha, K. (2008). Metodologia badań nad edukacją, [Methodology of Research in Education], Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Schaffer, H.R. (2006). Key Concepts in Developmental Psychology, London, Thousand Oaks, New New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Schön, D.A. (1991). The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Acton, New York: Ashgate Publishing Group.
Schunk, D.H. (2014). Learning Theories. An Educational Perspective, Sixth Edition, Boston: Paerson.
Spitzer, M. (2015). Cyberkrank!: Wie das digitalisierte Leben unsere Gesundheit ruiniert, [Ill with the Cyberspace! How our Health Becomes Damaged from Digitalised Life], München: DROEMER.
Szkudlarek T., Śliwerski B. (2009). Wyzwania pedagogiki krytycznej i antypedagogiki, [Challenges in Pedagogy and Anti-pedagogy], Kraków: “Impuls”.
Śliwerski, B. (2016). Czy sieć zastąpi szkołę i rodziców w edukacji i wychowaniu? – nowe wyzwania dla rodziców i systemu edukacji, [Will the Net Replace School and Parents in Education and Parenting?: New Challenges for Parents and Education System], (in:) M. Tanaś (ed.), Nastolatki wobec Internetu, [Teenagers and the Internet], 27-40, Warszawa: NASK.
Turula, A. (2010). Classroom Dynamics of Virtual Learning Environments: A Humanistic Perspective, CALL Review, 2, 11-15.
Twenge, J.M., Cooper, A.B, Joiner, T.E, Duffy, M.E., Binau, S.G. (2019). Age, Period, and Cohort Trends in Mood Disorder Indicators and SuicideRelated Outcomes in a Nationally Representative Dataset, 2005-2017, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 3 (128), 185-199, https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000410.
UNESCO Office Montevideo (2020). Children, adolescents and the use of the Internet in São Paulo and Buenos Aires: studies from a gender equality perspective, Communication and Information Discussion Notebooks, 19(32), 5-41.
Van Deursn, A., Van Dijk J. (2014). Digital Skills: Unlocking the Information Society, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wendland, M. (2011). Konstruktywizm komunikacyjny, [Communicative Constructivism], Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.