Słowa kluczowe
Ewolucja
Geoffroyizm
Levittoux
Nauka i Religia
Struve
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
Henryk Levittoux (1822-1879) is currently best known as the model of Jan Matejko who posed for him as Nicolaus Copernicus. Less known, however, is his concept of evolution, which he presented as a part of his philosophical system and which caused a heated debates among Polish intellectuals in the second half of the nineteenth century. Levittoux's theory, which was trying to combine religious dogma with the achievements of contemporary science, breaks out of the popular historical narrative, in which it is assumed that the discussions about the evolutionism were dominated by creationists and pro-Darwinian positivists. The aim of this article will be to present Levittoux's theory of evolution and to show how he combined the ideas of evolution with the concept of Divine creation. Secondary focus of the article will be to place his theory in the broader context of scientific and philosophical changes, that took place in the nineteenth century. Attention will be paid to the way in which the professionalization of science affected natural philosophers, such as Levittoux, who were refusing to accept the rigorous positivist methodology. It will also be shown how Levittoux’s evolutionism became part of the so-called "developmental evolutionism" which promoted a completely different vision of evolution than Darwinism. The non-Darwinian nature of Levittoux's evolutionism was inspired by Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire’s theory. Levittoux adopted his idea that species evolve thanks to the environmental stimulus which affects their ontogenesis. However, this idea will be extrapolated in Levittoux’s writings to the whole Earth. So, he will conclude that the Earth is the equivalent of the womb in which, like the fetus, all Life develops. All changes of species, in his opinion, are additionally controlled by a universal principle which he called the law of attraction-repulsion. This law was also the tool by which God created the world. The Levittoux’s concept is one of the first attempts to create a synthesis of evolutionism and religious thought in the Polish post-Darwinian philosophy of nature. Levittoux, as a continuator of Saint-Hilaire's thought, is also an interesting example of an attempt to instill in Polish philosophy French evolutionist thought.
Bibliografia
Bowler P.J. (1988). The non-Darwinian revolution. Reinterpreting a historical myth, Baltimore – London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bowler, P.J. (2009). Popular Science, (in:) P.J. Bowler, J.V. Pickstone (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 6: The Modern Biological and Earth Sciences, 622–634, New York: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572019.
Butler, S. (1878). Life and habit, London: Trubner.
Butler, S. (1922). Luck, or cunning as the main means of organic modification?, London: Jonathan Cape.
Ceccarell,i D. (2021). Recasting Natural Selection: Osborn and the Pluralistic View of Life, (in:) R.G. Delisle (ed.), Natural Selection, 171-191, Cham: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65536-5.
Chałupczyński, A. (1880) O niektórych błędach w teorii Darwina, [On some flaws in Darwin’s theory], Przyroda i Przemysł, 37, 439-441.
Cope, E.D. (1887). The origin of the fittest. Essays on evolution, New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Delisle, R.G. (2017). From Charles Darwin to the Evolutionary Synthesis: Weak and Diffused Connections Only, in: R. G. Delisle (ed.), The Darwinian Tradition in Context. Research Programs in Evolutionary Biology, 133-167, Cham: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69123-7.
Galera, A. (2021). Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire and the First Embryological Evolutionary Model on the Origin of Vertebrates, Journal of the History of Biology, 54, 229–245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-021-09638-5.
Herring, E., Loison, L. (2017). Lamarckian Research Programs in French Biology (1900–1970), in: R. G. Delisle (ed.), The Darwinian Tradition in Context. Research Programs in Evolutionary Biology, 243-269, Cham: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69123-7.
Hertz, K. (1872). Przegląd Piśmiennictwa Polskiego [Review of Polish Literature], Przyroda i Przemysł, 45, 542-543.
Hoyer, H. (1895). Obecne zapatrywania przyrodników na tak zwaną teorię Darwina, [Current views of naturalists on the so-called Darwin theory], Wszechświat, 47(XIV), 737-742.
Jenike, L. (1879) Doktor Henryk Levittoux, [Dr. Henry Levittoux], Tygodnik Ilustrowany, 194 (VIII), 161-162.
Kołodziejczyk, A. (1998) Życie i śmierć Karola Levittoux (1820-1841) w świetle źródeł historycznych i legendy, [The life and death of Charles Levittoux (1820-1841) in the light of historical sources and legend], Niepodległość i Pamięć, 2 (12), 53-67.
Konstańczyk, S. (2015). Recepcja teorii Darwina w filozofii polskiej XIX wieku, [Reception of Darwin’s theory in Polish philosophy of the 19th century], (in:) K. Bylica, R. Kilian, Piotrowski, D. Sagan (eds.), Filozofia — nauka — religia, 409-426, Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
Krajewicz, F. (1874). W Towarzystwie Przemysłowym w Poznaniu miał wczoraj p. Kozłowski odczyt o „morzu”, [Yesterday, at the Industrial Society in Poznań, Mr. Kozłowski had a lecture on “the sea.”], Wiarus. Pismo Średniego Stanu Polskiego, 134, 2- 3.
Kraszewski, J. (1877) Listy z Zakątka, [Letters from the corner], Biesiada Literacka, 88 (IV), 149- 150.
Levittoux, H. (1869a) Zarys filozofii Natury, [Outline of the philosophy of Nature], Warszawa: W drukarni Gazety Polskiej.
Levittoux, H. (1869b). Filozofia Natury, [Philosophy of Nature], Warszawa: W drukarni Gazety Polskiej.
Levittoux, H. (1869c). Polemika naukowa, Przegląd Tygodniowy. Życia Społecznego, Literatury i Sztuk Pięknych, 9, 72-75.
Levittoux, H. (1869d). Polemika naukowa, [Scientific polemic], Przegląd Tygodniowy. Życia Społecznego, Literatury i Sztuk Pięknych, 9, 117-118.
Levittoux, H. (1869e). Polemika naukowa, [Scientific polemic], Przegląd Tygodniowy. Życia Społecznego, Literatury i Sztuk Pięknych, 14, 117-118.
Levittoux, H. (1869f). Odpowiedź na krytykę pana Bronisława Strzemińskiego zamieszczoną w zeszycie IV Biblioteki Warszawskiej, za kwiecień 1869, [A response to the criticism of Mr. Bronisław Strzemiński included in the notebook of the Fourth Warsaw Library, for April 1869], Biblioteka Warszawska. Pismo poświęcone naukom, sztukom i przemysłowi, 2, 326-334.
Levittoux, H. (1874). Filozofia Natury, [Philosophy of Nature], Warszawa: W drukarni Gazety Lekarskiej.
Levitoux, H. (1877a). List dr. Levittoux, [Letter of dr. Levittoux], Biesiada Literacka, 92 (IV), 223.
Levitoux, H. (1877b). Korespondencja z miasta [Correspondence from the city], Wiek. Gazeta polityczna, literacka i społeczna, 240.
Levittoux, H. (1877c). Lettres à un ami sur quelques questions fondamentales du domaine de la philosophie de la nature, Paris: F. Savy, Libraire-Editeur. Levittoux, H. (1877d). Replika Dra Levittoux, Echo, 249, 9-10.
Łapicki, J. (1869a). Literatura Bibliografia i krytyka, (Filozofia Natury), [Literature Bibliography and Criticism. (Philosophy of Nature)], Gazeta Polska, 165, 2-3.
Łapicki, J. (1869b). Literatura Bibliografia i krytyka, (Filozofia Natury), [Literature Bibliography and Criticism (Philosophy of Nature)], Gazeta Polska, 169, 2-3.
Łapicki, J. (1869c). Literatura Bibliografia i krytyka, (Filozofia Natury), [Literature Bibliography and Criticism (Philosophy of Nature)], Gazeta Polska, 170, 2.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance, Cambridge – London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Ochoa, C. (2021). The Origins of Theoretical Developmental Genetics: Reinterpreting William Bateson’s Role in the History of Evolutionary Thought, (in:) R.G. Delisle (ed.), Natural Selection, 137-170, Cham: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65536-5.
Ochorowicz, J. (1869) Przegląd Literatury Polskiej, [Review of Polish Literature], Przegląd Tygodniowy. Życia społecznego, Literatury i Sztuk Pięknych, 5, 36-37.
Próchnicki, M. (1869) Korespondencje od i do Redakcji, [Correspondence from and to the Editorial Office], Przegląd Tygodniowy. Życia społecznego, Literatury i Sztuk Pięknych, 12, 104.
Rejchman, B. (1882). Teoria Darwina w stosunku do nauki i życia – szkic ogólny, [Darwin’s theory in relation to science and life–general outline], Ateneum, 27 (3), 510-527.
Skórkowski, A. (1880). Geneza miłości, [The genesis of love], Przyroda i Przemysł, 36, 425-427.
Skórkowski, A. (1881). Idea Boga w brzaskach XX-go wieku [The idea of God in the dawn of the 20th century], Przyroda i Przemysł, 52, 613-615.
Struve, H. (1876). Synteza dwóch światów. Szkic filozoficzny, [A synthesis of two worlds. A philosophical sketch], Warszawa: Nakładem Gebethnera i Wolffa.
Struve, H. (1877). Odpowiedź Henryka Struve na pretensje Pana Levittoux, [Henryk Struve’s answer to the claims of Mr. Levittoux], Warszawa: W drukarni Jana Noskowskiego.
Strzemiński, B. (1869). „Zarys filozofii natury” przez Henryka Levittoux, [“An Outline of the Philosophy of Nature” by Henry Levittoux], Biblioteka Warszawska. Pismo poświęcone naukom, sztukom i przemysłowi, 2, 136-142.
Supiński, J. (1883). Pisma, [The scriptures], Warszawa: Nakład Gebethnera i Wolffa.
Trombik, K. (2017). Stefana Pawlickiego i Władysława Zaborskiego polemika z darwinizmem (1872–1886), [Stefan Pawlicki and Władysław Zaborski polemic with Darwinism (1872–1886)], Teologia i Człowiek, 37 (1), 109-121, http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TiCz.2017.006.
Ulett, M.A. (2014). Making the case for orthogenesis: The popularization of definitely directed evolution (1890–1926), Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 45, 124-125, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.11.009.
Urbanek, A. (2007). Jedno istnieje tylko zwierzę… Myśli przewodnie biologii porównawczej, [There is only one animal ... Key thoughts of comparative biology], Warszawa: Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN.
Wagner, M.J. (2020). Interpretacje rozwoju biologii ewolucyjnej na przełomie XIX i XX wieku, [Interpretations of the development of evolutionary biology at the turn of the 19th century], Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri, https://doi.org/10.47943/lib.9788363487478.
Wartenberg, F. (1866). O Teorii Darwina, [About Darwin’s Theory], Poznań: W komisie księgarni M. Leitgebra.