Jak cytować
Abstrakt
The aim of the study was to determine the role of self-assessment and the assessments reflected in the quality of relations in close relationships. The theoretical frame of this part of the study is the relationship linking the Sexual Strategies Theory by Buss and Schmitt and Trifactorial Theory of Love by Robert Sternberg. In accordance with the theory multifaceted frame of love highlights a variety of its components, which may reveal relevant relationships, occur at various levels and in different layouts, creating different layouts for love. In our study, we assumed that the perceiving reciprocal behaviour and their attributes, and the partners validate the relationship is correlated with rating value of reproduction in terms of self-assessment and the assessments reflected.
The study involved 228 heterosexual participants between the age of 18-45 years old (M = 24.19, SD = 4,89). Quality and durability of close relationship was measured by the Relationship Quality Questionnaire – KJZ. Assessment of reproductive value in terms of self-assessment and the assessments reflected was measured using a Reproduction Values Scale – SWR.
The results were in line with the assumptions: perceiving reciprocal behaviour and their attributes, and the partners validate the relationship is correlated with rating value of reproduction in terms of self-assessment and the assessments reflected.
Bibliografia
Braun-Gałkowska, M. (1980). Miłość aktywna. Warszawa: IW PAX.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
Buss, D. M. (1994). The strategies of human mating. American Scientist, 82, 238-249.
Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies.
In: E. T. Higgins, A. W. Kruglanski (eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 3-38). New York: Guilford.
Buss, D. M. (2001). Psychologia ewolucyjna. Gdańsk: GWP.
Buss, D. M. (2007). Zazdrość. Niebezpieczna namiętność. Gdańsk: GWP.
Buss, D. M. (2014). Ewolucja pożądania. Jak ludzie dobierają się w pary. Gdańsk: GWP.
Buss, D. M., Barnes, M. F. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
Buss, D. M., Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-32.
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year
of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 193-221.
Dawkins, R. (2010). Najwspanialsze widowisko świata. Warszawa: CiS.
DeSteno, D. A., Salovey, P. (1996). Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy: Ques-tioning the „fitness" of the model. Psychological Science, 7, 367-372.
Guilford, J. P. (1960). Podstawowe metody statystyczne w psychologii i pedagogice. Warszawa: PWN.
Jastrzębski, J. (2015, czerwiec). Konstrukcja, właściwości psychometryczne i zastosowanie Skali Wartości Reprodukcyjnych SWR. Referat wygłoszony na XXIV Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Psychologii Rozwojowej, Warszawa.
Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1998). Evolution, pair bonding, and reproductive strategies:
A reconceptualization of adult attachment. In: J. A. Simpson, W. S. Rholes (eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford.
Kuczyńska, A. (1998). Sposób na bliski związek. Zachowania wiążące w procesie kształtowania się i utrzymania więzi w bliskich związkach. Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN.
Nęcki, Z. (1990). Wzajemna atrakcyjność. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Niziołek, K., Gołębiewska, E.,Jastrzębska, J. Skoczek, A. Jastrzębski, J. (2015, czerwiec) Ocena własnej wartości reprodukcyjnej, a poziom intymności, namiętności i zaangażowania w bliskich związkach. Referat wygłoszony na XXIV Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Psychologii Rozwojowej, Warszawa.
Orians, G. H., Heerwagen, J. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. W: J. Barkow. L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (red.), The adapted mind (pp. 555-579). New York: Oxford University Press.
Regan, P. C. (1980). Minimum mate selection standards as a function of perceived mate value, relationship context, and gender, Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 10, 53-73.
Rostowski, J. (1987). Zarys psychologii małżeństwa. Warszawa: PWN.
Shostak, M. (1981). Nisa: The life and words of a !Kung woman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. In: R.J. Sternberg, M. L. Barnes (eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 119-138). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection.
In: B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.
Wojciszke, B. (2003). Psychologia miłości. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Znaniecki, F. (1991). Prawa psychologii społecznej. Warszawa: PWN.