Słowa kluczowe
komunikacja online
komunikacja offline
związek romantyczny
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
Cyfryzacja życia okazała się zarówno niezbędna, jak i ważna dla zachowania ciągłości funkcjonowania społeczeństw oraz jednostek w okresie pandemii. Spotkania z ludźmi odbywały się w większości zdalnie, tak jak konsultacje lekarskie, prawnicze czy zakupy. I choć przed 2020 rokiem narzędzia służące do komunikacji w sieci były znane, to ich rozkwit i powszechne wykorzystanie przypadły na lata kryzysu pandemicznego. Współcześnie cyfryzacja w dużym stopniu wiąże się ze wszystkimi sferami ludzkiego życia, także tymi, które odnoszą się do tworzenia bliskich relacji interpersonalnych. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie wniosków płynących z rozważań naukowych nad psychologicznymi aspektami komunikacji interpersonalnej w związkach romantycznych, w kontekście cyfryzacji życia. Przedstawiono modele oraz wymiary komunikacji w związkach romantycznych oraz ich znaczenie dla funkcjonowania człowieka. Omówiono niektóre psychologiczne aspekty komunikacji interpersonalnej na trzech etapach związku romantycznego, tj. tworzenia nowej, bliskiej relacji w sieci, trwania związku w cyfrowej rzeczywistości oraz zakończenia związku romantycznego.
Bibliografia
Adler, R.B., Rosenfeld, L.B. & Proctor, II R.F. (2018). Relacje interpersonalne. Procesy porozumiewania się. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Rebis.
Akhtar S. & Khan A. (2019). Internet usage and associated factors among college students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 6(6), 2331–2334. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394–6040.ijcmph20192293
Al-Saggaf, Y., MacCulloch, R. & Wiener, K. (2018). Trait boredom is a predictor of phubbing frequency. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 1–8(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0080-4
Alshenqeeti, H. (2016). Are emojis creating a new or old visual language for new generations? A socio-semiotic study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 56–69. http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/article/view/2823
Ansari, A. (2021). The Role of Interpersonal Communication Skills in Human Resource and Management. International Journal of Science and Research, 10(11), 916–922.
Arikewuyo, A.O., Abdulbaqi, S.S., Omoloso, A.I., Lasisi, T.T. & Arikewuyo, H.O. (2022). Evaluating the use of social media in escalating conflicts in romantic relationships. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2331.
Ayee, E.S.A. (2013). Human communication revisited – A biblical perspective. Koers 78(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v78i1.549
Bernard, B.-C., Vintila, M. & Tudorel, O. (2020). Self-Esteem in Online Dating. Agora Psycho-Pragmatica, 14(2), 123–135.
Błachnio, A., & Przepiórka, A. (2019). Be aware! if you start using Facebook problematically you will feel lonely: Phubbing, loneliness, self-esteem, and Facebook intrusion. A crosssectional study. Social Science Computer Review, 37(2), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318754490
Breward, M., Hassanein, K. & Head, M. (2017). Understanding consumers’ attitudes toward controversial information technologies: a contextualization approach. Information Systems Research, 28(4), 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0706
Buhaş, R. (2014). A Qualitative Approach of Online Relationships. Annals of University of Oradea, Fascicle Sociology–Philosophy & Social Work, 13, 29–48.
Carvajal, E.T. (2017). Families and technologies. What about the phubbing in Mexico? Horyzonty Wychowania, 16(37), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.17399/HW.2017.163704
Chen, Q., Yuan, Y., Feng, Y., & Archer, N. (2021). A decision paradox: benefit vs risk and trust vs distrust for online dating adoption vs non-adoption. Internet Research, 31(1), 341–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-07-2019-0304
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K.M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the generic scale of phubbing (GSP) and the generic scale of being phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5–17. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.020.
Christensen, A. & Heavey, C. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81.
Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. http://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019
Cutrona, C.E. & Suhr, J.A. (1994). Social support communication in the context of marriage: An analysis of couples, supportive interactions. in: B.R. Burleson, T.L. Albrecht, I.G. Sarason (eds.), Communication of Social Support: Messages, Interactions, Relationships, and Community, 113–135. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dakowicz, A. (2011). Potrzeby indywidualne małżonków zadowolonych i niezadowolonych ze swojego związku. Edukacja, 3, 99–105.
Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S.K., Singh, J.V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., & Przepiórka, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of “Phubbing” among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 25(1), 35–42.
Deans, H. & Bhogal, M.S. (2019). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: a brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9715-4
DeVito, A.J. (2016). The Interpersonal Communication. Essex: Pearson.
Eichenberg, C., Huss, J., & Küsel, C. (2017). From Online Dating to Online Divorce: An Overview of Couple and Family Relationships Shaped Through Digital Media. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9434-x
Fejes-Vékássy, L., Ujhelyi, A., & Faragó, L. (2022). From #RelationshipGoals to #Heartbreak – We use Instagram differently in various romantic relationship statuses. Current Psychology, 41(10), 6825–6837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01187-0
Finkel, E.J., Eastwick, P.W., Karney, B.R., Reis, H.T. & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online Dating. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522
Floyd, K. (2002). Human Affection Exchange: V. Attributes of the Highly Affectionate. Communication Quarterly, 50(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370209385653
Floyd, K. & Riforgiate, S. (2008). Affectionate communication recevied from spouses predicts stress hormone levels in healthy adults. Communication Monographs, 75(4), 351–368. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/03637750802512371
Floyd, K., Pauley, P.M. & Hesse, C. (2010). State and Trait Affectionate Communication Buffer Adults’ Stress Reactions. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 618–636. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/03637751.2010.498792
Fox, J. & Tokunaga, R.S. (2015). Romantic Partner Monitoring after Breakups: Attachment, Dependence, Distress, and Post-Dissolution Online Surveillance via Social Networking Sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0123
González-Rivera, J., Segura-Abreu, L., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing in Romantic Relationships: Cell Phone Use, Couple Satisfaction, Psychological Well-Being and Mental Health. Interacciones, 4(2), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.24016/2018.v4n2.117
Gottman, J., & Krokoff, L. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47–52. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47
Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Tolan, G.A. & Marrington, J. (2013). Face-to-face or facebook: can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017
Halpern, D., & Katz, J.E. (2017). Texting’s consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051
Hammond, R., & Chou, H.-T. G. (2015). Using Facebook: Good for Friendship but Not So Good for Intimate Relationships. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473780-006
Harwas-Napierała, B. (2014). Specyfika komunikacji interpersonalnej w rodzinie ujmowanej jako system. (W:) I. Janicka, H. Liberska (red.), Psychologia rodziny, 47-72. Warszawa: PWN.
Heavey, C., Layne, C., & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 16–27. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.16
Heavey, C., Christensen, A., & Malamuth, N. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 797–801. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.797
Hobbs, M., Owen, S., & Gerber, L. (2017). Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783316662718
Jiang, C.L., Bazarova, N.N., & Hancock, J.T. (2011). The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
Jitaru, M. (2020). Determinants of Women’s Couple Satisfaction: Communication Patterns, Ambivalent Sexism and Sex Roles. International Journal of Education & Psychology in the Community, 10(1/2), 7–20.
Jolin, S., Lafontaine, M.-F., Brassard, A., & Lussier, Y. (2022). Which comes first? Associations between communication patterns and relationship satisfaction in couples over a 1-year period. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/cbs0000342
Juhasz, A., & Bradford, K. (2016). Mobile phone use in romantic relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 52(8), 707–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2016.1157123
Kalsens, B. (2016). The Social Media Paradox Explained: Comparing Political Parties’ Facebook Strategy Versus Practice. Social Media + Society, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116644616
Kelly, L., & Miller-Ott, A.E. (2018). Perceived Miscommunication in Friends’ and Romantic Partners’ Texted Conversations. Southern Communication Journal, 83(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2018.1488271
Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among “Generation Y” users. Research Papers, 109. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/109
Kujath, C.L. (2011). Facebook and MySpace: Complement or substitute for face-to-face interaction? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1-2), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0311
Lamichhane, Y.R. (2016). Non-verbal skills: Unavoidable in communication. Repositioning, 1(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.3126/repos.v1i0.16046
Lăzărescu, G.M., & Vintilă, M. (2021). The Necessity of Couple Education Regarding the Impact of Online Infidelity on Romantic Relationships. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series VII: Social Sciences. Law, 14 (63)(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2021.14.63.2.13
LeFebvre, L.E. (2017). Phantom lovers: Ghosting as a relationship dissolution strategy in the technological age. (In:) N.M. Punyanunt-Carter & J.S. Wrench (eds.), Swipe right for love: The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships, 219–236. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
LeFebvre, L.E., Allen, M., Rasner, R.D., Garstad, S., Wilms, A., & Parrish, C. (2019). Ghosting in emerging adults’ romantic relationships: The digital dissolution disappearance strategy. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618820519
Liberacka-Dwojak, M., & Izdebski, P. (2021). Psychospołeczne wyznaczniki komunikacji seksualnej: przegląd badań. Seksuologia Polska, 19, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5603/SP.2021.0002
Luk, T.T., Wang, M.P., Shen, C., Wan, A., Chau, P.H., Oliffe, J., Lam, T.H., & Chan, S.S. (2018). Short version of the smartphone addiction scale in Chinese adults: Psychometric properties, sociodemographic, and health behavioral correlates. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(4), 1157–1165. https://doi:10.1556/2006.7.2018.105
Lusiawati, I. (2019). Public Service in Interpersonal Communication. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(5), 484–488. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i5.1719
Madahi, M., Samadzadeh, M., & Javidi, N. (2013). The Communication Patterns & Satisfaction in Married Students. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1190–1193.
Mallory, A.B. (2022). Dimensions of couples’ sexual communication, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 36(3), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000946
McDaniel, B.T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. New Delhi.
Mosley, M.A. & Lancaster, M. (2019). Affection and abuse: technology use in adolescent romantic relationships. American Journal of Family Therapy, 47(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2019.1586592
Naumovski, V., Dana L.-P., Pesakovic, G. & Fidanoski, F. (2016). Why interpersonal communication is important in public administration? Współczesne Problemy Ekonomiczne, 1(14), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.38104/vadyba.2022.1.05
Nayar, B., & Koul, S. (2021). From likes to love trust catalyzing the digital romantic journey. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(1/2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2020-0002
Nehal, R. (2017). Measuring the impact of interpersonal written communication on employability potential in HR sector: A case for writing a research proposal. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342110073_Measuring_the_impact_of_interpersonal_written_communication_on_employability_potential_in_HR_sector_A_case_for_writing_a_research_proposal_Raashid_Nehal
Nguyen, T., White, S., Hall, K., Bell., R., L. & Ballentine, W. (2019). Emotional Intelligence and Managerial Communication. American Journal of Management, 19(2), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v19i2.2068
Onyeator, I. & Okpara, N. (2019). Human Communication in a Digital Age: Perspectives on Interpersonal Communication in the Family. New Media and Mass Communication, 78, 35–45, https://doi.org/10.7176/NMMC
Otondo, R.F., van Scotter, J.R., Allen, D.G. & Palvia, P. (2008). The complexity of richness: Media, message, and communication outcomes. Information & Management, 45(1), 21–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.09.003
Pancani, L., Aureli, N., & Riva, P. (2022). Relationship Dissolution Strategies: Comparing the Psychological Consequences of Ghosting, Orbiting, and Rejection. Cyberpsychology, 16(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2022-2-9
Parol, M. (2013). Potrzeby a relacje między mężczyznami a kobietami. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 2(13), 5-15. https://www.stowarzyszeniefidesetratio.pl/Presentations0/01Parol2013.pdf
Peng, K. (2020). To be attractive or to be authentic? How two competing motivations influence self-presentation in online dating. Internet Research, 30(4), 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2019-0095
Pereira, M.G., Fontes, L., Vilaça, M., Machado, J.C., Fincham, F., Costa, E., & Taysi, E. (2022). Communication, Forgiveness and Morbidity in Young Adults Involved in a Romantic Relationship. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 22(2), 165–175. https://www.ijpsy.com/volumen22/num2/613.html (access: 05.02.2023).
Plopa, M. (2006). Więzi w małżeństwie i rodzinie. Metody badań. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.
Plopa, M. (2017). Kwestionariusz Satysfakcji Seksualnej. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 22(4), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.14656/PFP20170401
Pollmann, M.M. H., Norman, T.J., & Crockett, E.E. (2021). A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100088
Powell, D.N., Freedman, G., Williams, K.D., Le, B. & Green, H. (2021). A multi-study examination of attachment and implicit theories of relationships in ghosting experiences. Journal of Social and Person.al Relationships, 38(7), 2225–2248. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211009308
Prieler, M., & Kohlbacher, F. (2017). Face-ism from an International Perspective: Gendered Self-Presentation in Online Dating Sites Across Seven Countries. Sex Roles, 77(9–10), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0745-z
Przywara, B., Leonowicz-Bukała, I. (2020). Bądźmy w kontakcie. Współczesna cyfrowa komunikacja permanentna. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze, t. 63, 3(243), 9–32 https://doi.org/10.4467/22996362PZ.20.019.12090
Purnomo, E., Ma’mun, A., Kusmaedi, N., Hendrayana, Y., Hidayat, Y., Jermaina, N. & Marheni, E. (2021). Profile: Interpersonal Communication Skills for Future Coaches. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(5), 964–972. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090518
Raport. Poczucie samotności wśród dorosłych Polaków, CBOS https://instytutpokolenia.pl/pdf/SAMOTNOSC_14.11.pdf (access: 09.03.2023).
Rais, M., R. (2020). Contribution of Self Confidence and Peer Conformity to Interpersonal Communication. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies, 3(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.32698/0992
Ranzini, G. & Lutz, C. (2017). Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media and Communication, 5(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916664559
Roberts, J.A., & David, M.E. (2022). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction through the lens of social allergy theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 195, 111–676. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6432445
Ryś, M. (1999). Psychologia małżeństwa w zarysie. Warszawa: Centrum Metodyczne Pomocy Psychologiczno-Pedagogicznej MEN.
Ryś, M., Greszta, E., Śledź, K. (2020). The feeling of being loved and the language of communication of young adults. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 2(42), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.34766/fetr.v42i2.316
Soni, R., Upadhyay, R., & Jain, M. (2017). Prevalence of smart phone addiction, sleep quality and associated behaviour problems in adolescents. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(2), 515–519. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20170142
Sternberg, R.J. & Weis, K. (2007). Nowa psychologia miłości. Taszów: Moderator.
Suwalska-Barancewicz, D., & Malina, A. (2018). Samoocena i styl przywiązania jako predyktory oceny zachowań komunikacyjnych własnych oraz partnera. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 23(3), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.18.017.9358
Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.026
Timmermans, E., Hermans, A.-M., & Opree, S.J. (2021). Gone with the wind: Exploring mobile daters’ ghosting experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(2), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520970287
Vanden Abeele, M. (2020). The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and a research agenda. (In:) R. Ling, G. Goggin, L. Fortunati, S.S. Lin, & Y. Li (eds.), Handbook of mobile communications, culture, and information, 158–174. Tilburg University: Oxford University Press.
van der Zanden, T., Schouten, A.P., Mos, M.B. J., & Krahmer, E.J. (2020). Impression formation on online dating sites: Effects of language errors in profile texts on perceptions of profile owners’ attractiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(3), 758–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519878787
van der Zanden, T., Schouten, A.P., Mos, M.B. J., & Krahmer, E.J. (2022). Originality in online dating profile texts: How does perceived originality affect impression formation and what makes a text original? PLoS ONE, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274860
Venter, E. (2019). Challenges for meaningful interpersonal communication in a digital era. Theological Studies, 75(1), a5339. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i1.5339
Walęcka-Matyja, K. & Janicka, I. (2021). Rodzina jako wartość. Analiza psychologiczna wartości rodzinnych. Łódź: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Walęcka-Matyja, K., & Szkudlarek, A. (2019). Psychologiczne predyktory zadowolenia z bliskiego związku interpersonalnego. Rola komunikacji emocjonalnej. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 38(2), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.34766/fetr.v2i38.66
Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12–17. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.01.
Ward, J. (2017). What are you doing on Tinder? Impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication and Society, 20(11), 1644–1659. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252412
We Are Social, & Hootsuite. (2020). Digital 2020: Global digital report 2020. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview (access: 13.03.2023).
Yam, F.C., & Ilhan, T. (2020). Holistic technological addiction of modern age: Phubbing. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.551299.
Yam, F.C., & Kumcagız, H. (2020). Adaptation of general phubbing scale to Turkish culture and investigation of phubbing levels of university students in terms of various variables. Addicta: Turkish Journal on Addictions, 7(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.5152/addicta.2020.19061
Yam, F.C. (2023). The Relationship Between Partner Phubbing and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Relationship Satisfaction and Perceived Romantic Relationship Quality. Psychological Reports, 126(1), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221144611
Youarti, I.E., & Hidayah, N. (2018). Perilaku phubbing sebagai karakter remaja generasi Z. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 4(1), 143–152.